Archive for the ‘questions’ Category

Tim Russert’s “Meet The Press” Replacement Finally Named

December 2, 2008

David Gregory, NBC’s chief White House correspondent, reportedly will succeed Tim Russert as moderator of the venerable Sunday morning show ‘Meet the Press.’

NBC News will name chief White House correspondent David Gregory to succeed the late Tim Russert as host of ‘Meet the Press,’ Politico.com reported Tuesday.

The Sunday morning staple has been without a permanent host since the iconic Russert, 58, collapsed and died June 13. Tom Brokaw has been filling in on a temporary basis.

By AOL, Wire Services

Dartmouth College campus - Democratic Presidential Candidates Debate 45 - David Gregory.jpg
David Gregory does a live news report….

Read the rest:
http://news.aol.com/article/gregory-to-host-
meet-the-press/265693

******

By Matea Gold
The Los Angeles Times
December 2, 2008
Reporting from New York — Speculation about who will be the next moderator of “Meet the Press” ratcheted up another level Monday as the Huffington Post reported that the job was going to NBC chief White House correspondent David Gregory, while the network maintained that no announcement was imminent.

Read the rest:
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-
meetthepress2-2008dec02,0,4188661.story?track=rss

David Gregory, NBC News chief White House correspondent and ... 
David Gregory, NBC News chief White House correspondent and host of ‘Race for the White House’, takes part in the NBC News Decision ’08 panel at the NBC Universal summer press tour in Beverly Hills, California July 21, 2008.(Fred Prouser/Reuters)

Advertisements

Clinton-China Fundraising Connection

October 21, 2007

The candidate’s unparalleled China-connected fundraising success relies largely on the least-affluent residents of New York’s Chinatown — most of whom can’t be tracked down.

By Peter Nicholas and Tom Hamburger
Los Angeles Times Staff Writers
October 19, 2007

NEW YORK — Something remarkable happened at 44 Henry St., a grimy Chinatown tenement with peeling walls. It also happened nearby at a dimly lighted apartment building with trash bins clustered by the front door.

And again not too far away, at 88 E. Broadway beneath the Manhattan bridge, where vendors chatter in Mandarin and Fujianese as they hawk rubber sandals and bargain-basement clothes.

All three locations, along with scores of others scattered throughout some of the poorest Chinese neighborhoods in Queens, Brooklyn and the Bronx, have been swept by an extraordinary impulse to shower money on one particular presidential candidate — Democratic front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Dishwashers, waiters and others whose jobs and dilapidated home addresses seem to make them unpromising targets for political fundraisers are pouring $1,000 and $2,000 contributions into Clinton’s campaign treasury. In April, a single fundraiser in an area long known for its gritty urban poverty yielded a whopping $380,000. When Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) ran for president in 2004, he received $24,000 from Chinatown.

At this point in the presidential campaign cycle, Clinton has raised more money than any candidate in history.

Those Chinese dishwashers, waiters and street stall hawkers are a significant part of the reason.

Campaign concerns

As with other campaigns looking for dollars in unpromising places, the Clinton operation also has accepted what it later conceded were improper donations. At least one reported donor denies making a contribution. Another admitted to lacking the legal-resident status required for giving campaign money. Clinton aides said they were concerned about some of the Chinatown contributions.

The Times examined the cases of more than 150 donors who provided checks to Clinton after fundraising events geared to the Chinese community. One-third of those donors could not be found using property, telephone or business records. Most have not registered to vote, according to public records.

And several dozen were described in financial reports as holding jobs — including dishwasher, server or chef — that would normally make it difficult to donate amounts ranging from $500 to the legal maximum of $2,300 per election.

Of 74 residents of New York’s Chinatown, Flushing, the Bronx or Brooklyn that The Times called or visited, only 24 could be reached for comment.