Archive for the ‘American Foreign Service Association’ Category

Obama’s Impact: Global Diplomatic Good Will Rising

November 14, 2008

Buoyed by a groundswell of global good feeling after the election of Barack Obama, current and former U.S. diplomats see a new chance to advance American interests if the next president keeps his promises to devote more resources to the diplomatic corps and foreign aid.

By Nicholas Kralev  
The Washington Times

In e-mails to The Washington Times, diplomats from four continents said good will toward the United States has increased dramatically since Mr. Obama’s election and is already making a difference in their daily work.

John K. Naland, president of the American Foreign Service Association, the diplomats’ union, said it was crucial to bolster the resources devoted to diplomacy to sustain the positive new feelings.

“The expectation of the Foreign Service is that President-elect Obama will follow through on his campaign pledges by asking Congress for additional funding for diplomacy and development assistance,” Mr. Naland said. “Those funds are needed because, without adequate numbers of properly resourced and well-trained diplomats and development professionals, no amount of personal diplomacy by the president, vice president or secretary of state will single-handedly restore our nation’s role as the world’s leader in global affairs.”

The Bush administration, initially bolstered by foreign support after Sept. 11, lost overseas backing after it invaded Iraq. The U.S. image also has suffered from the revelations of abuse at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo and because of security measures that have made it difficult for foreigners to visit the United States.

During the campaign, Mr. Obama made a number of promises to boost diplomacy.

In March, he said he would “invest in our civilian capacity to operate alongside our troops in post-conflict zones and on humanitarian and stabilization missions. Instead of shuttering consulates in tough corners of the world, it’s time to grow our Foreign Service and to expand [the U.S. Agency for International Development].”

Mr. Naland said the U.S. “foreign affairs agencies are hobbled by a human-capital crisis.” He cited a report last month by the American Academy of Diplomacy – a body including all living former secretaries of state – that recommended that staffing be increased by 43 percent at the State Department and by 62 percent at USAID.

 President-elect Barack Obama speaks to world leaders from Chicago on Nov. 6. U.S. diplomats from four continents told The Washington Times that good will toward the U.S. has already increased. (Agence France-Presse/Getty Images)

The current shortages make it difficult for diplomats to take time off for training, he said. At the same time, more training is necessary given the expanded duties assigned to diplomats in recent years, from nation-building to lobbying for free trade.

“Try something completely new and different, learn a complicated language in 15 minutes, parachute in and instantly hit the ground running, get to know everyone immediately, get everyone to do everything perfectly,” was how one Foreign Service officer in Iraq described the expectations for U.S. diplomats today.

Read the rest:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/nov/
14/diplomats-see-boon-of-good-will-since-obama-win/

Advertisements

Diplomatic Corps: Division Over War Assignments

November 6, 2007

By Nicholas Kralev
The Washington Times
November 6, 2007

The growing pressure on State Department personnel to serve in Iraq, which culminated in Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s decision to resort to forced assignments, has polarized the Foreign Service to a level not seen in decades, American diplomats say.
 


Ryan C. Crocker, U.S.
Ambassador to Iraq.
Some of them said the Bush administration is straining the world’s largest diplomatic corps in support of an almost impossible mission. Others accuse their colleagues of whining and not living up to the oath they took to serve their country.

“We are concerned that directed assignments of Foreign Service civilians into a war zone would be detrimental to the individual, to the post and to the Foreign Service as a whole,”

Steve Kashkett, vice president of the American Foreign Service Association, wrote in a cable to the union’s members.
Iraq service was taking its toll long before the announcement a little more than a week ago that Miss Rice would “direct” diplomats to serve in Iraq, State Department employees said.

Read the rest:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/
article?AID=/20071106/FOREIGN/111060060/
1001