Attributes of Mumbai Attacks Suggest Outside Help

Counterterrorism officials and experts said the scale, sophistication and targets involved in the Mumbai attacks were markedly different from previous terrorist plots in India and suggested the gunmen had received training from outside the country. But they cautioned it was too soon to tell who may have masterminded the operation, despite an assertion from a previously unknown Islamist radical group. 

 

By Craig Whitlock and Karen DeYoung
Washington Post Foreign Service
Friday, November 28, 2008; Page A01

Officials in India, Europe and the United States said likely culprits included Islamist networks based in Pakistan that have received support in the past from Pakistan’s intelligence agencies.

Analysts said this week’s attacks surpassed previous plots carried out by domestic groups in terms of complexity, the number of people involved and their success in achieving their primary goal: namely, to spread fear.

“This is a new, horrific milestone in the global jihad,” said Bruce Riedel, a former South Asia analyst for the CIA and National Security Council and author of the book “The Search for Al Qaeda.” “No indigenous Indian group has this level of capability. The goal is to damage the symbol of India’s economic renaissance, undermine investor confidence and provoke an India-Pakistani crisis.”

Several analysts and officials said the attacks bore the hallmarks of Lashkar-i-Taiba and Jaish-i-Muhammad, two networks of Muslim extremists from Pakistan that have targeted India before. Jaish-i-Muhammad was blamed for an attack on the Indian Parliament in 2001.

Both groups have carried out a long campaign of violence in the disputed territory of Kashmir, which India and Pakistan have fought over for six decades. The roots of the long-running conflict are religious: A majority of India’s population is Hindu, while most Pakistanis are Muslim.

A U.S. counterterrorism official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said Lashkar-i-Taiba, which means “Army of the Pious,” and Jaish-i-Muhammad, or “Soldiers of Muhammad,” are “the thing people are starting to look at. But I can’t caution enough to treat it as a theory, a working assumption. It’s still too early for hard and fast” conclusions.

“What the Indians have in their favor,” the official added, “is that they’ve got some of these guys. It seems logical that they can expect to work their way back reasonably quickly.” Indian officials said several gunmen were captured.

Read the rest:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/w
p-dyn/content/article/2008/11/27
/AR2008112702177.html?hpid=topnews

Advertisements

2 Responses to “Attributes of Mumbai Attacks Suggest Outside Help”

  1. Rachel Says:

    I guess these terrorists are just never going to give it up. I think ALL the countries need to get involved in this…not just the USA. I think Americans should delay any overseas trips for awhile. Seems like the tourists take a hit also. It is such a shame.

  2. P Singh Says:

    Scale, sophistication and targets involved in the Mumbai attacks all points toward ISI of Pakistan.
    But what is interesting is the double speak of americans leaders.They would say in New Delhi what suits New Delhi and in Islamabad they will praise Pakistan.
    I think it should be very clear to Indians that USA/West will not fight for them
    they(Indians) themselves will have to find solutions.
    A better option would be Shanghai Cooperation Organization rather than cozy up to West.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: